Family. Parents. Siblings.
They raised you. They grew up with you. They were there for you, from the time you learned how to talk, to the time you outgrew your first set of teeth, moving on to when you graduated primary school and then completed your secondary education, until now.
Always being there for you. Through thick and thin, ups and downs.
Which brings me to the 2nd situation I’ve been left by my friend to ponder with:
There’s an accident and you’re on the spot. You find out that your mom is in the car(just an example!!!), badly wounded. So badly that you know that there is no hope to save her. And there’s another person in the car, a stranger, badly wounded too but can be saved if prompt action is taken.
Who will you try to save?
Maybe the correct choice to make is to save the one who has a chance of survival, but will you do it?
Truth be told, I’ll try to save the one who’s my family. Even if I know there’s no hope of saving, I’ll still try. Even if there’s no breathe left inside the person, I’ll still try to resuscitate. Even if she’s dead, I’ll hug the body and sob with grief, rather than focus on saving the other person.
Or as my friend joked
“Even if she is decapitated, I’ll be preoccupied in finding her head or any missing part of her body, than saving the other person.”
Or is it a joke?
In this kind of situations, is it logical, to be saving the one beside while your loved one is dying or dead without you even attempting to do anything? If it is so, isn’t it cruel, to be so logical?
A doctor, or a daughter?
i think i will save the other person...because my mom won't be so happy with me if i leave someone to die because of her....it will be a burden..
ReplyDelete